Post-COVID-19 condition in the German working population: A cross-sectional study of 200k registered stem cell donors.

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has strained health systems worldwide, and infection numbers continue to rise. While previous data have already shown that many patients suffer from symptoms for months after an acute infection, data on risk factors and long-term outcomes are incomplete, particularly for the working population. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to provide information on the prevalence of post COVID-19 conditions in a subset of the German working-age population (18-61 years old) and to analyze risk-factors. METHODS: We conducted an online survey with a health questionnaire among registered potential stem cell donors with or without a self-reported history of PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Logistic regression models were used to examine the risks of severity of acute infection, sex, age, body mass index, diabetes mellitus and arterial hypertension medication on post COVID-19 symptoms. RESULTS: 199,377 donors reported evaluable survey questionnaires: 12,609 cases had a history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and 186,768 controls had none. Overall, cases reported physical, cognitive and psychological complaints more frequently compared to controls. Increased rates of complaints persisted throughout 15 months post infection, e.g. 28.4/19.3% of cases/controls reported fatigue (p<0.0001) and 9.5/3.6% of cases/controls reported loss of concentration (p<0.0001). No significant differences were observed in the frequency of reported symptoms between three- and 15-months post-infection. Multivariate analysis revealed a strong influence of the severity of the acute SARS-CoV-2 infection episode and age on the risk for post-COVID-19 conditions. CONCLUSION: We report the prevalence of post-COVID-19 conditions in mainly unvaccinated individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infections between February 2020 and August 2021. Severity of the acute course and age were major risk factors. Vaccinations may reduce the risk of post-COVID-19 conditions by reducing the risk for severe infections. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Individual HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 Genotypes Are No Major Factors Which Determine COVID-19 Severity.

HLA molecules are key restrictive elements to present intracellular antigens at the crossroads of an effective T-cell response against SARS-CoV-2. To determine the impact of the HLA genotype on the severity of SARS-CoV-2 courses, we investigated data from 6,919 infected individuals. HLA-A, -B, and -DRB1 allotypes grouped into HLA supertypes by functional or predicted structural similarities of the peptide-binding grooves did not predict COVID-19 severity. Further, we did not observe a heterozygote advantage or a benefit from HLA diplotypes with more divergent physicochemical peptide-binding properties. Finally, numbers of in silico predicted viral T-cell epitopes did not correlate with the severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections. These findings suggest that the HLA genotype is no major factor determining COVID-19 severity. Moreover, our data suggest that the spike glycoprotein alone may allow for abundant T-cell epitopes to mount robust T-cell responses not limited by the HLA genotype.

CCR5Δ32 mutations do not determine COVID-19 disease course.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of the 32 bp deletion (CCR5Δ32) in the coding region of the C-C chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) on the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2 and severe COVID-19. METHODS: Cross-sectional study among stem cell donors registered with DKMS in Germany. Genetic information was linked to self-reported COVID-19 outcome data. Multivariable regression models were fitted to determine the risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2, severe respiratory tract infection (RTI) and respiratory hospitalization. RESULTS: CCR5 information was available for 110 544 donors who were tested at least once for SARS-CoV-2; 5536 reported SARS-CoV-2 infection. For 4758 donors, the COVID-19 disease course was fully evaluable; 498 reported no symptoms, 1227 described symptoms of severe respiratory tract infection, of whom 164 required respiratory hospitalization. The distribution of CCR5Δ32 genotypes (homozygous wild-type vs CCR5Δ32 present) did not differ significantly between individuals with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection (odds ratio (OR) 0.96, 95% CI 0.89-1.03, P = 0.21) nor between individuals with or without symptomatic infection (OR 1.13, 95% CI 0.88-1.45, P = 0.32), severe RTI (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.88-1.22, P = 0.68) or respiratory hospitalization (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79-1.69, P = 0.45). CONCLUSIONS: Our data implicate that CCR5Δ32 mutations do not determine the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections nor the disease course. TRIAL REGISTRATION: We registered the study with the German Center for Infection Research (https://dzif.clinicalsite.org/de/cat/2099/trial/4361).

Stem cell donor registry activities during the COVID-19 pandemic: a field report by DKMS.

The COVID-19 pandemic has serious implications also for patients with other diseases. Here, we describe the effects of the pandemic on unrelated hematopoietic stem cell donation and transplantation from the perspective of DKMS, a large international donor registry. Especially, we cover the development of PBSC and bone marrow collection figures, donor management including Health and Availability Check (HAC), transport and cryopreservation of stem cell products, donor recruitment and business continuity measures. The total number of stem cell products provided declined by around 15% during the crisis with a particularly strong decrease in bone marrow products. We modified donor management processes to ensure donor and product safety. HAC instead of confirmatory typing was helpful especially in countries with strict lockdowns. New transport modes were developed so that stem cell products could be safely delivered despite COVID-19-related travel restrictions. Cryopreservation of stem cell products became the new temporary standard during the pandemic to minimize risks related to transport logistics and donor availability. However, many products from unrelated donors will never be transfused. DKMS discontinued public offline donor recruitment, leading to a 40% decline in new donors during the crisis. Most DKMS employees worked from home to ensure business continuity during the crisis.